Heroes Fanatic
News Episode Guides Quotes Photos Music Cast The Heroes Spoilers Forum
Reply to Post Reply to Post

episode "Five Years Gone" Season 1 ??????

  1. oj777
    Guest

    Its very late to bring this up, especially when everyone is into the 2nd season. I watched the episode "Five Years Gone" from season 1 the other day and there's 1 major thing I don't understand about the episode.

    In the beginning of the episode future Hiro and Hiro from the past collide. At that time future Hiro explains to Hiro from the past that he attempted to kill Sylar by stabbing him however, Sylar didn't die because he regenerated. He regenerated because he KILLED THE CHEERLEADER and took her powers. However later in that episode we find out that the Cheerleader is still alive IN THE FUTURE; however, Sylar disguised as Nathan kills her at the end of the episode.  This is a conflict b/c when future Hiro tries to kill Sylar, apparently the Cheerleader should have been still alive and with the Cheerleader alive Sylar couldn't have regenerated meaning that Sylar should be dead.

    Anybody care to explain??????????

     

    Posted 11/7/2007 5:25:41 PM #
  2. anu naki
    Guest

    excellent catch. I'm dumbfounded and it hurts. Somebody, please help.....

    Posted 11/7/2007 6:14:47 PM #
  3. 1<3Peter
    Guest

    What happened was that future Hiro visited Peter and urged Peter to save the Cheerleader which he did and that changed the future.  When future Hiro was telling present Hiro that he stabbed Sylar and he didn't die, he hadn't found out that Peter was able to save the cheerleader.  If you watch the episode again you'll catch it.  Besides I don't think the writers are stupid enough to leave that gapping hole.

    Posted 11/7/2007 11:14:05 PM #
  4. Dung-Pile
    Guest

    Did somebody say, 'gapping hole'??? mmmm... 

    Posted 11/8/2007 1:23:42 AM #
  5. Maj
    Guest

    YUP I AGREE...THIS WAS THE ONLY EPISODE LAST SEASON WHICH I WAS LIKE *WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT*   All they shouldve done with this episode was NEVER show Claire in the future and that she was dead.   Then you can assume it was some sort of other time line.  The second they showed Claire in the future...The episode was STUPID... 

    Posted 11/8/2007 10:41:03 AM #
Total Posts: 5

You are not logged in. You are posting as a guest. Click here to login. Click here to register.

Your Name:

Your E-mail: (will NOT be published)

Reply: